THE TRUTH
[Through No Fault of My Own]
For fifty years with heart in hand, trying hard to understand
In Indian eyes I’ve been a light, “guilty ‘cause my skin is white.
I didn’t take your land away, as I hear the Natives say.
Someone did, and that’s a crime, but that was long before my time
Just who of you can cry despair, when none of you were really there?
We all are victims of our race, with no control of what took place.
What I say now may well be crude, but I resent your attitude.
Life’s not fair, I will agree, so bear your own hypocrisy.
You tell of living off the land, how everything was made by hand.
You say that life was best by far – Then brag about your latest car.
You claim the old days were the best [or so you must have heard I guess]
You sit and tell it all to me, while watching football on T.V.
There’s few of us, and let’s not kid, who’d live as our ancestors did.
In modern clothes you’ve made your mark – Could you go back to wearing bark?
Is this not pure hypocrisy to live and dress the same as me;
Then,” cry get out it’s not your home”; then buy our Tupperware and chrome?
I’m tired with trying to be sincere – to justify my being here.
Your sanctimonious act no doubt – I dare you all to here me out.
In my bewildered guilty awe, I’ve heard you call me,”damn white squaw”.
And then proceed- in honeyed tone – “Can I use your telephone?”
And for pollution were to blame [at least that’s what I here you claim]
And yet I saw there as I strode, your garbage dumped beside the road.
This land will never be the same... We’re mostly, but not all to blame.
If white mans presence is so grim, why try so hard to be like him?
There’s those of you who bitch and frown. With every word you run us down.
You want the goods we represent. Yet blame us for your discontent.
You say you want the same as me – equal opportunity.
If you believe in what you say, then let’s talk equal all the way.
Let’s settle first this quest at hand – The ardent issue of this land.
Like you this country I revere – both of us were born in here.
And so you’ll be on par with whites, let’s drop the special fishing Rights.
The baby bonus comes to you. You get the old age pension too.
And so the bigots can’t compare, you’ll want no more of free health care.
Your parity will be enhanced, if Feds can keep their native grants.
Equality is now at hand – I wonder if you understand?
Licenses to hunt and trap [not really any handicap]
You’ll have to pay just like the white, if you insist on equal Rights.
Cameras, TV, fast cars too, are white mans toys, to name a few.
You’ll want them all; and that’s a fact! So why not pay your taxes Mac.
It’s for the souls long gone to bone; the ones who really lost their home;
The ones that hurt when white man came; for them our fathers bear the shame.
I’ve said it all; I rest my case; and now I meet them face to face.
Recall “The Truth” next time you say…
“THE WHITE MAN TOOK MY LAND AWAY!!!”
Edit by Casey
Author Unknown
Nationalization Law Ignored By Canadian Politicians
The year 1947 witnessed two important developments in the constitutional relationship between Canada and the British Crown. One of which was; On January 1, 1947, the law granting the right of Canadian citizenship to every native-born Canadian and to all who take out citizenship papers went into effect.
This means that there are only three kinds of people in Canada; Canadians born in Canada
Canadian Immigrants
Tourists
The above states that all who are born in Canada are Canadians; this Law is ignored in the following paragraphs taken from Canada’s historical documents.
It is also interesting to note that under International Laws,' a person assumes the nationality of the country that they are born in”
Thus Canadian politicians are not only in violation of their own Laws but also in violation of International Law when they list peop[e born in Canada as Indians and French when by Law they are Canadians
However, if the Indians and French of Canada followed the nationalization laws they would have no claim to special status in Canada and could not make claims to historic lost lands;[ this can be rephrased; they would have no claim to the public purse greater than any other Canadian.]
The question is," Why are the politicians ignoring the nationalization Law and allowing the French and Indians to build nations inside the Confederation of Canada.”
The instillation of nations within nations can only lead to civil war in the future. As each nation grows it requires more space and demands more power from the “Mother” nation. This added tax on the Canadian people [not contained in the separate nations] can only lead to resentment. Why should people who wish to be Canadians pay taxes and give up their lands to those who do not want to be Canadian?
Are the Canadian politicians blind to their poor judgement in the handling of those anti-Canadian people or do they have a hidden agenda which, if the Canadian people knew about, would cause severe repercussions.
Excerpt;
“Indigenous peoples, designated in the census as “Aboriginal,” [it has been proven since then that Indians are not aboriginals—there were two races of people in North America prior to the Indian races] made up about 3 percent of Canada’s inhabitants in 1996 [Notice that they did not say 3 percent of all Canadians] . They live across Canada in every province and territory, with about 45 percent concentrated in the Prairie provinces, according to the 1996 census. Less than half of Canada’s indigenous peoples live on reserves set aside for Indian bands. In the Arctic and sub-Arctic, where the climate has discouraged permanent European settlement, they are the majority. They divide themselves into nations, each with a traditional territory, language, and culture. The groupings and homelands have changed over time. For example, the Bear lake only became a nation in the 20th century; the Neutral and several neighbouring nations were broken up in the 17th century; and the Sioux did not arrive in Canada until the 19th century.”
HISTORIC DOCUMENTS
The Indian Act, 1876
The Indian Act of 1876 consolidated and amended earlier statutes regarding the rights of indigenous peoples in Canada. The legislation represented the Canadian government’s effort to assimilate indigenous peoples into mainstream society [by delineating them as Indians—not Canadians—a sure fire way to cause future problems]. The act focused on three main subjects: allocation of reserve lands, defining “Indian” status, and granting powers of enforcement to the Canadian government. [This begins the Indian Industry ; an error in judgement which has since backfired. Now the Indians are using the political stupidity of the Canadian government to position themselves to run the western part of Canada—from Manitoba west to the coast—on a public input law—thereby controlling what ever the government does relative to the country’s natural resources; slowly they are building a third tier government which will utilize the existing governments own rules to control the elected government.]; the end results of this will be that Canadians from Ontario west to the west coast will be under the DICTATORSHIP of the Indians. Essentially ran by an unelected government
The federal Indian Act recognizes four categories of indigenous people: Status Indians, who are registered on an official roll; Inuit; Métis, people of mixed European and indigenous heritage [This is a laugh; all the Indians are of mixed genetics now. What Right does a person of mixed Indian and ,say German, genetics have to call themselves Indian? Why not German? Or because they were born in Canada, why not Canadian? Answer; because they would not have special access to the public purse as a Canadian]; and non-Status Indians, people of indigenous descent who are not on the official roll. For administrative purposes, indigenous peoples in Canada are also divided according to band. A band is the smallest indigenous political unit; there are about 600 bands in Canada, corresponding roughly to local indigenous communities.
WHAT DOES THE ABOVE MEAN TO CANADIANS ?
The aspirations of the Indian leaders have progressed considerably; but for the time being let us look at where they came from in 1997. The agreements of 1997 were listed in the readers Digest, March 1997 ,by Robert Nielson in his editorial, “Giving Canada Away Claim by Claim”; commentaries on the Indian activities were supplied by Mr. Mel Smith, a legal constitutional counsel for the British Columbia Government.
Listed below are just a few land claims made by the Indians in 1997;
NWT; 24000 aboriginals granted outright ownership of 505952 square kilometres of land
Fishing, hunting trapping Rights in 2.16 million square kilometres [nearly 1/4 of Canada’s area]
A ‘handsome’ percentage of royalties from any oil, gas and mineral developments
Government cash payments beginning in 1999 off $1.3 billion [$54,000 per native] out of YOUR tax dollars
Nunavut [the new territory formed] will have powers equal to a province for fewer than 25000 people [ not even a large city] at a cost of
$334 million for buildings [more YOUR tax dollars] ; $520 million operating cost [ more YOUR tax dollars] annually
GREAT BEAR LAKE
1,755 Dene and metis received outright ownership of 41,500 square kilometres of land
Mineral, oil and gas rights to 1800 square kilometres
7.5% of all royalties above $2 million
Cash award of $75 million [more YOUR tax dollars]
SASKATCHEWAN
$446 million [more YOUR tax dollars] over 12 years to 26 Bands with the Rights to buy 1.6 million acres of land over the province.
[ This is a really good deal; Let’s para- phrase it]; they take OUR money to buy OUR land then send US the bill for development and maintenance; then exempt US from any ownership or control; IT’S SORT OF LIKE ME BORROWING YOUR MONEY TO BUY YOUR CAR THEN SENDING YOU THE BILLS FOR GAS AND REPAIR BUT DENING YOU A RIDE without having to pay back the loan.
Comments;
NISGA’A NASS VALLEY B.C.
There are 6000 Nisga’a in Canada; 715 live in the Nass Valley. Each year they get $32.1 million and were given $40.4 million at the time of the treaty. Let’s see; 32.1million divided by 6000 = $5350 a head per year—THIS YOUR TAX MONEY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE
Ron Jamieson,” By the end of the decade [2008], aboriginal people are going to own or control a third of the Canadian land mass and be the recipients of $5 or $6 billion [of YOUR tax dollars]; this means that YOU will be under the DICTATORSHIP OF THE INDIANS by 2008.
SUBSIDIZATIONS; [on reservations]
Health care$900million per year
Subsidized housing on reserves [cost unknown]
Education; $7000 per pupil annually for elementary school
$9,500 per student for college and universities
Exempt; income tax
Property tax
PST
GST
[ ALL FROM YOUR TAX DOLLARS
The above is an indication of how expensive the Indian treaties are to the Canadian tax payer; bear in mind that the treaties listed are only a small fraction of the number of treaties completed; with many more to come. Tax dollars paid for infrastructure to support 30 million people by all the Canadian people is now going into the hands of 600,000 Indians—with no bennifits to the rest of Canada—a complete throw-away of the Canadian tax payer’s hard earnt tax money
YUKON TERRITORY;
When the other 10 nations of the Yukon join the first four nations the Indians of the Yukon will be completely under their own government . This is a laugh! There will be a total of 6000 Indians comprising 14 nations; hell! They don’t even make up a good sized town let alone a nation ; and they have their own government? Ludicrous! How in hell are they going to govern themselves independent of the rest of the people of the Yukon? There are 22000 white people in the Yukon under Canadian rule; when the two governments clash—and they will—there will be much animosities and , most probably violence, when the Indians try to push the Canadians around—and they will!
All of this came from an error in judgement from the Canadian government; Or was it really an error? Could it be possible that the Indian Industry was established for reasons of a hidden agenda? On November 23, 2006, Prime Minister Harper stood up in parliament and claimed that Quebec was a nation within a nation. Is it possible that the former French government of Canada under Trudeau and Chrétien formed the legality of the Indian nations to form a precedence for the claiming of Quebec as another nation within the nation of Canada? Sure looks that way! But separatism does not seem to be on the agenda. Is there still one more hidden agenda which has yet to be exposed?
The old Bush [senior] government of the US often referred to ’The New World Order [NWO]. What precisely was he referring to? Information is sketchy on the NWO and it’s intentions; but some things are known about it and it’s agenda;
It was conceived from the mind of a Nazi Colonel in 1947
It is ran by the super rich
It wants a world dictatorship
It will dissolve all sovereignties
All boarders to countries will be removed
It wants the world population reduced to 500 million people
Paul Martin is a member
Prime Minister Harper is a member
Trudeau was a member
Chrétien and Malroney are members
Does it seem strange that all of Canada’s PMs since 1967 have been French; any that were elected by the Canadian people who were not French [Clark, the blond bitch] were kicked out and a French man was instilled.
Does it surprise you that the new leader of the Liberal party is French?
Does it surprise you that that person came from France?
Does this mean that if this Dion Frenchman from France is elected PM of Canada that France is running Canada by proxy?
Not entirely! Once the Indians acquire their full government and have acquired either possession or control over the western provinces and NWT there will be no longer any need for a Federal government in the west; thus the east section of what was once Canada will be governed by the French—from France. [The instillation of the Old New France prior to 1865]
This means that, for you westerners, if you now own your own home, you will have to pay the Indians rent—to the tune of $20,000 or more a year. This precedence was set in Vancouver when the Indians were granted Rights to lands that were owned by whites. The Indians demanded rent from the whites [formally called Canadians] for having houses on their land—even though the whites fully owned their houses!
So, you formally called Canadians, get ready to crawl; because you sure as hell are not going to stand up and fight! That takes guts!
IS THIS THE FINAL HIDDEN AGENDA?
Lets assume that the NWO takes over Canada in 2010 as is rumoured and the North American Alliance Treaty, - which was signed by Bush, Martin and Fox, - is established [essentially this means that Canada will be annexed to the United States]; what will happen to Canada? Looking at the current developments we see a strong Indian presence from Manitoba west to the west coast and a growing French presence from Quebec eastward [the Fleur De Lis flys freely over Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick] Does this mean that an Indian government will rule the western regions of what is now Canada and the French will rule the eastern region once the 49th boarder is removed? What this means for those who ,now, wish to be called Canadian is anybody’s guess. At present Canadians have no Constitutional Rights [only privileges—Item#33 Charter of Rights—and so will fall under the dictatorship of those in Canada whom have Rights—The French [French Constitutional Rights] and Indians [Treaty Rights]. Essentially Canada will be annexed to the US along with Mexico [is that why the American government is ‘dragging it’s feet’ on their illegal immigrant issue?} and the new States [ Indian Canada, French Canada] will be under the control of the Head of the New United States of America Alliance.
It is still not clear just how the NWO intends to run the world; but for it to have the power to rule it must have the most powerful military in the world [can we guess where that is?]
Let’s look at another possibility. Canada is a VERY spacious country with vast natural resources and a comparatively small population[ about 30 million people] ; once the boarders of North America are removed there is nothing to stop a general influx of people from south of the boarder into Canadian regions. Just from the current US and Mexico the Canadian population could triple. Canadians, currently in charge of their country , would be outvoted in every category; but is that all we should fear? If all boarders are removed, globally, what is to stop India or China from relocating 100 million, each, of their surplus population to Canada. According to the suggested N W0 program this is entirely possible. Those two countries could each relocate 50 million people per year to places like Canada or Australia and still have a population increase each year. Essentially this would mean that Canada would have no protection to retain it’s ideologies, customs or traditions—not to mention the pending rape of our natural resources to the ‘have not's’ of the world.
Over and above all else is the religion problems that would arise. Presently in Canada we have freedom of religion; but once the over crowded Moslems, Hindus, Buddha, etc. crowd into Canada , will they tolerate religious freedoms that we now enjoy—when they outnumber us by 100,000 to one? Not likely! Canada will have the same religious strife which now exists in other parts of the globe and freedom of religion will become a ‘thing of the past’.
The big question of the issue is ,”Will Canadians do anything to protect themselves from such a political move which will destroy their country?” NO! Canadians are uninformed, tolerant, passive, uninterested [in a word—cowards]. Basically Canadians are afraid to stand up and give their name, age and the day of the week, let alone speak out against the government. Hell! The French government took away all Constitutional Rights from anyone who chose to be called Canadian and not one person said boo; the current government of Canada does not even list Canadian in it’s list of races in Canada—not a peep out of anyone. Canadians, in their own country are listed as Others by the government. Will Canadians stand and defend their country against a United States annexation in 2010? Will Canadians stand up and defend their home land from the French? Will Canadians hold firm against the Indian takeover of their western provinces?
Never! They will die the death of the sheep they are!
Casey
Canadians
If I had fought a little harder for what belonged to me perhaps I would still have a place to hang my hide